Case 02
Eucerin
Campaign work through VCCorp / Admicro
PROJECT RELATIONSHIP
Campaign work through VCCorp / Admicro. Eucerin was not my employer.
The case focuses on campaign QA and the handoff between an operations owner and the specialists responsible for creative or technical implementation.
Role boundary
MY ROLE
Campaign Operations / QA / Coordination
SPECIALIST TEAMS
Creative / Technical Implementation
I received or checked requirements and materials, reviewed demo output, communicated feedback, coordinated revision work, monitored progress, verified the revised output against requirements, and continued campaign execution after approval. Specialist teams owned the creative or technical changes.
BOUNDARY NOTE
QA and coordination did not include coding, banner/rich-media development, specialist design, technical remediation, or final client approval.
Reconstructed QA Relay
RECONSTRUCTED FROM APPROVED EVIDENCE
-
MATERIAL / REQUIREMENTS
I received or checked campaign requirements and supplied materials, then compared the inputs with the requirements relevant to execution. This established what was ready to move into demo review.
MY ROLE — QA / coordination
-
DEMO CHECK
I reviewed demo output against the available campaign or client requirements. My QA role was to connect an issue with the relevant requirement and make it clear to the next owner before campaign continuation.
MY ROLE — QA / coordination
-
FEEDBACK
When an item required revision, I collected or communicated the feedback and coordinated the next step with the team responsible for implementation.
MY ROLE — coordination
-
SPECIALIST REVISION
Creative or technical implementation remained with specialist teams. They handled the changes that belonged to their expertise; I coordinated the relay and monitored progress. The owner change stays visible throughout the diagram.
SPECIALIST TEAMS — creative / technical implementation
-
VERIFICATION
After the specialist revision, I checked the resulting output against the relevant campaign or client requirements. Verification closed the feedback loop before the work moved forward through the appropriate approval path.
MY ROLE — QA / coordination
-
CONTINUATION
Once the appropriate approval was in place, I continued campaign execution and delivery follow-through. QA was part of the operating sequence, not a detached review exercise.
MY ROLE — campaign operations
The relay is a live-text reconstruction of supported operating work, not a source screenshot.
Campaign operations context
Campaign operations context
Where applicable, I handled setup and trafficking, configuration against client- or agency-supplied parameters, targeting, material/KV checks, delivery monitoring, optimization, reporting, operational budget handling, and stakeholder coordination.
The case narrows that wider scope to its distinctive proof: the material, demo, feedback, specialist-revision, and verification relay.
Why the handoff matters
Why the handoff matters
Campaign QA often sits between the person who identifies or receives an issue and the specialist who implements the change. The handoff works only when requirements, feedback, ownership, and verification stay connected.
I kept that operating relay moving. Specialist teams retained implementation ownership.
What this proves
What this proves
For a Campaign Operations or agency hiring manager, the case shows that I can handle the less visible work between receiving campaign materials and continuing delivery. I check against requirements, communicate issues clearly, hand work to the correct owner, follow the revision, and verify before moving forward.
The recruiter value is reliability across boundaries: enough campaign understanding to identify what needs attention, clear ownership at the handoff, and enough follow-through to prevent the work from becoming a dead end.